Town Council Meeting Video: March 12, 2012

Here’s the video for the March 12 meeting of the Southbridge Town Council.  If you’d like to download a copy of the agenda, have at it.

Forms of Municipal Government Around Massachusetts

Hi, Southbridge folks!

Quick update on the (lack of) meeting video:  I’ve been having problems with the Mac I typically use for digitizing the meetings.   Please bear with me.

In the meantime:  I couldn’t help but notice that even before the infamous petition started making the rounds there was a storm of Internet Drama brewing, huge even by Southbridge standards.  I’m pretty sure I’ve yet to meet someone who’s perfectly happy with our Charter as it stands; I mean, even the majority of our current sitting Town Councilors are hoping to change it this year. (Ugh.)

Other folks in town want us to return to a Town Meeting form of government and have started collecting signatures on a petition.  (In the interest of full disclosure: I would support a change along these lines, with the caveat that I do not like a lot of the aspects of the petition as written, and I think the best way for a municipality to go about substantive Charter changes is by way of an elected Charter Commission.)

Still others think we’d be better off with a Mayor form of government, although to the best of my knowledge there doesn’t seem to be any sort of activist push to organize for same.  (A brief FYI: arguing on the Internet does not count as activism.)

Not being one who likes to wander into a knife fight without first making a spreadsheet, I looked up a bunch of information from the 2010 Census, the Mass. Municipal Association, and the Mass DOR.  I wanted to see where we fit in with other towns and cities across Massachusetts in terms of our form of government, our population, and our property taxes.  This is what I came up with:

Forms of Municipal Gov’t in MA, with Population & Property Tax Info
(If you don’t have Excel on your computer, you can view it in Google Docs right over here.)

FYI, the property tax info came from the DOR’s “Average Single Family Tax Bills and Values” worksheet (available here), which excludes communities with a residential exemption for their local property taxes.  (I had no idea before tonight there was such a thing as a residential exemption for local property taxes, and now I’m totally jealous of the communities that utilize one.  The Hingham, MA Assessor’s office has more information if you want to learn more about them.)

It doesn’t do anything fancy, but by playing around with the “Sort” feature on my dumb little worksheet I have so far noticed the following:

-The Council-Manager form of  government is exceedingly rare here in Massachusetts.  Out of 351 municipalities across the state, there are only eight communities in Massachusetts with this organizational structure.  (Nine if you count Franklin and their Council-Town Administrator setup.)

-We’re the only community in Worcester County with this form of government.

-The overwhelming majority of towns and cities with Councils serving as thier legislative bodies (as opposed to Open or Representative Town  Meetings) have Mayors.  (46 out of 55.)

-Most Massachusetts communities with Mayors are much larger than ours:  out of 45 communities with Mayors, only four are under 20,000 people.

-Most communities with Town Managers in the role of Chief Municipal Officer have BOS/Town Meeting forms of Gov’t.  (56 out of  a total of 63.)

-Most communities with our approximate population have Town Meeting forms of government.   There are 43 cities and towns in Massachusetts with populations between 14,000 and 20,000  residents.   Of these communities, only two have Council-Manager forms of government, including Southbridge.   Four have Mayor-Council forms of government, three have Representative Town Meetings, and the remaining thirty-four have Open Town Meeting forms of government.

-At this point, I haven’t seen any link between form of municipal government and property tax rates or the average yearly property tax bill for single family homes.

What’s my takeaway from all of this?   …I don’t really know.   I haven’t really been all that vocal on this issue because I’ve been spending a lot of time trying to collect my thoughts.  I definitely don’t like the status quo here in town, but I think we need to do a lot more than change our organizational chart to turn this ship around.  I think one of the biggest problems we face here in town (aside from economic development) is a lack of civic engagement.  Would people be more active in local government if they could vote on the Town’s budget at Annual Town Meetings?  Would more voters participate in local elections if someone were running for Mayor?

…I think I’m going to need another spreadsheet.

Sunshine Week Panel Discussion on WCCA TV-13

This panel discussion with journalists and activists aired on Worcester’s Cable Access channel.

Watching this, I am (by and large) impressed with the strides Worcester has made in terms of making their local government more open and accountable to the public, and the fact that they’re open to going even further to improve transparency in local government. Here’s a video of the Sunshine Week-related agenda items at Tuesday’s Worcester City Council meeting:

Sunshine Week comes to Southbridge Police Department, creepy intimidation of journalist ensues

So, it appears “Town Officials Behaving Badly” is our theme for the week. Hot on the heels of yesterday’s embarrassment, the Telegram and Gazette reported yesterday that at least two members of the Southbridge PD did not comply with public records law when journalists came to the station and requested to view police logs.

According to Commonwealth law, daily police logs must be freely available to the public during normal business hours and at all other reasonable times. (For more info about MA public records law as it pertains to police records, check out this handy guide at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.)

Noncompliance with the law was an unfortunate trend across the board in Worcester County, but police officers in Southbridge apparently went the extra mile to intimidate a T&G reporter:

Southbridge Police Department officers and supervisors twice broke the law, for example, by telling two requesters, who visited the station on different days, that the police log is not available to the public. Police said a person requesting information would have to show identification and fill out a form giving their name and reason for the request in order to get any information about police activity.

When one of the requesters exercised his legal right not to give his name, a Southbridge officer used his cruiser’s license plate scanning equipment to establish the identity of the requester.

(Who is this CREEPY AND GROSS person working for the Town of Southbridge? I want a name.)

This unfortunate episode is kind of a bizarre coincidence, actually, because it just so happens that someone from the ACLU of Massachusetts helped me file a public records request with the Southbridge Police Department back in October, requesting information about the Department’s use of Automatic License Plate Recognition technology.

This is the information I received back from Chief Charrette:

Southbridge Police Department – Automatic License Plate Detection Technology public records request

By and large, the Town of Southbridge is doing better than some other Massachusetts communities in terms of the glaring privacy issues relating to this technology. What troubles me, however, is that as of October 18 of last year, there was no specific policy in place regarding the use of this easily abused technology:

5. The Department does not have a policy specifically governing the use of ALPR as it falls under the same regulations as all other data.

6. The Department does not have standard operating procedures or policy governing the use of ALPR.

Much to his credit, Southbridge Police Chief Daniel Charette acknowledged that his officers were wrong to ask a requester to show ID and then, when he declined to provide it, to run his license plate number through the Registry of Motor Vehicles database to establish his identity.    As this incident illustrates, the fact that there’s no specific policy regarding the use of this technology leaves it open to being willfully exploited by police officers that should (but apparently don’t) know better than to intimidate members of the public who come in for routine records requests.   I think now would be a perfect time to work with the Police Chief and members of the PPP subcommittee to draft a sensible policy that can be approved by the Town Council.

FYI, there’s a Town Council meeting tonight at 7pm, and apropos to Utterly Failing at Transparency, it looks like they never published a copy of the meeting agenda on their website. Happy Sunshine Week, everybody!

Lost father leaves large shadow; Anonymous Town official is a total douche

I’m working on a longer article about the various Charter-related controversies brewing here in town, but in the meantime, I saw something in the Telegram & Gazette that really rubbed me the wrong way:

click through for article

Buried at the end of the article: “A town official said some of Mr. Belanger’s properties barely met the sanitary code.”

I cannot believe:

a) that “a Town official” would be so obviously inappropriate in their comments for an article about a local resident who just lost his life in a horrible accident,
b) Brian Lee would print such a tasteless anonymous quote in reporting on the tragic death of a local resident, and
c) his editors would be down with it.

I grew up going to school with Mr. Belanger’s kids, and I am heartbroken to hear the news that they’ve just lost their last living parent.  As a member of the community here in Southbridge, I find the fact that one of our public officials here in town is so deeply unprofessional as to make such cruel and disrespectful anonymous remarks in this family’s time of loss is A TOTAL EMBARRASSMENT to the town.

I can’t help but wonder who would say such a blatantly hurtful and obnoxious thing about a dead man, in the context of their role as a Town official.  Was it our Town Manager, Christopher Clark?  Nick Tortis, our Building Inspector?  Maybe Health Director Jim Morin?  Someone on the Town Council?  Who would do such a thing?

In conclusion:

Shame on you, anonymous “Town official.”
And shame on you too, T&G.

Here’s hoping that in the future we can expect a little bit more in the way of basic human decency from our friends at 41 Elm Street, and those that report on them in the local media.

Town Council Meeting Video – February 27, 2012

Just in time for your weekend festivities, here’s Monday’s video of the Southbridge Town Council:

..and here’s your meeting agenda: 02-27-12 Agenda

H.3900: An Act relative to the charter of the Town of Southbridge

Some pesky health problems this winter have gotten in the way of my writing as of late, but I wanted to take a few minutes to update you on an issue I’ve been following here since this past fall: the proposed changes to the Southbridge Home Rule Charter. (See here for what I’ve written previously on the issue.)

Guess what? The bill so many of us love to hate, H.3900 (“An Act relative to the charter of the Town of Southbridge”), is finally headed for its hearing in front of the Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government this coming Wednesday, February 29th, at 11 a.m.

For those of you who aren’t familiar with this piece of legislation, it’s the result of the Southbridge Town Council’s rather fantastically ridiculous meeting of October 3, 2011 in which they chose to address the recommendations of the Charter Review Committee by adopting some things, ignoring others, changing some things entirely, and throwing one or two other random provisions just for the fun of it, I suppose.

What we ended up with at the end of the meeting was a set of proposed charter changes that overall served to strengthen the Town Manager position and, inexplicably, restrict ballot access for Town residents seeking to be candidates in local elections. The Charter language relating to the Board of Health was further played around with at a subsequent meeting on October 24, after Councilor Regis claimed to have received “dozens and dozens” of constituent calls from people who were opposed to an elected Board of Health.

The former members of the Charter Review Committee themselves had publicly taken issue with this special legislation and I know that there are others in town who had some pretty significant problems with it as well. I don’t know when this upcoming hearing on Wednesday was posted, but it’s something I’ve had my eye on. Does anyone in town feel like taking a field trip?

updated waste ban permits, BoH meeting agenda

No time for any actual writing right now, but I just received the paperwork for the Landfill tonnage increase and updated waste ban permits that the DEP released yesterday, and I thought I’d share it with anyone who might be interested:

Southbridge 39743 vol inc_WBCP FN pmts 02-08-12 revised.pdf

On a related note, the Southbridge Board of Health is meeting tonight at 6:30pm in the McCann Conference Room. Looks like they’re done talking Tattoos for now and Trash is back on the table.

Southbridge BoH Meeting Agenda: 2/9/12

Town Council Meeting Video – February 6, 2012

34 minutes? I think this is a new record. Here’s the agenda for February 6, 2012 if you’re inclined to read it.

Anyone want to place bets on the out-of-towner that will be appointed to the new Economic Development Commission? Based on local custom, I’m guessing someone from Sturbridge.

Town Council Meeting Video – January 23rd, 2012

My copy of this video only starts seven minutes into the meeting–if anyone is willing to provide me with a better version, please let me know!

Southbridge Town Council Meeting – January 23, 2012 from Amelia P on Vimeo.

The meeting agenda is right here.

In other news, I received a complaint from a reader last night about how this website is blocked on the free public wifi network at Town Hall:

GreaterSouthbridge.org is blocked at Town Hall again.

The draconian filtering policies of the free public wifi at Town Hall are obviously well out of my control, so if this is something you take issue with, I’d advise you to take it up with the management.